no way to compare when less than two revisions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+====== Lab tests 2012-05-11 ======
+===== Init test (without Torleif) =====
+  * Case I (27ms + 27ms):
+    * conduct-clap  + conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob)
+    * Vivianne: more behind than last trail (which was 27 + 0ms)
+    * Leif Arne: No change noticed
+  * Case II (48 + 27, aspect and resolution change in video viewed by conductor)
+    * conduct-clap  + conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob)
+    * Vivianne: not much difference
+    * leif arne & daniel: Less syncronized, more difficult two follow during slow-down
+  * Case III (48 +48, aspect+resolution change both directions):
+    * conduct-clap
+    * clap (no conduct)
+      * echo (reverberation) noticable and disturbing
+    * clap (no conduct, one-way audio)
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob, one-way audio)
+    * ?
+  * Case V (48 + 70)
+    * Better image, one way audio
+    * conduct-clap
+    * clap-clap
+      * vivanne can hear delay
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob, one-way audio)
+    * clap-clap with two-way audio
+===== Tests with Torleif, Vivanne, Daniel, Leif Arne =====
+  * Case 0 (in same room)
+    * conduct-clap
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
+    * clap-clap
+    * vivianne: conduct-clap less presise than clap-clap
+  * Case I (27+27)
+    * conduct-clap
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
+    * clap-clap
+    * Thorleif: conductor is smaller, feels more distant
+    * Vivianne: no noticable delay (compared to in-rom)
+    * Leif Arne: camera infront no longer an issue (compare to previous test day)
+  * Case III (48+48)
+    * conduct-clap
+      * camear adjustment needed (due to aspect ratio bug)
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
+    * clap-clap
+    * Vivianne: conducting works fine, clapping has delay, on speedup your are behind, on slowdown your are in sync
+  * Case V (48 + 70)
+    * conduct-clap
+      * 30 fps: All noticed, smudged movements
+      * Retail with 60 fps
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
+    * clap-clap
+      * Vivianne:
+        * bigger camera make poorer contact with middle person
+        * delay is managable, simpilar to what is common with large choir (large choir may even be worse)
+  * Case "Screen size"
+    * Recorded conductor
+    * Vivianne: When conductor is approx real size he seems too close
+      * Combination of too close and recorded conductor is unatural
+    * Torleif: No problem with enlarged sizes
+    * Leif Arne: Keystone problems
+    * Vivanne: 75% of real height seems to be a minimum, smaller give you a "look-for-him" feeling
+    * Torleif: Size is easy to get used to, close to real size is preferrable though
+    * Vivianne: Conductors gaze not in camera (but moving around in virtual choir) makes a more distant feeling.
+  * Case VI (with gstreamer video in one pipeline)
+   * To be tested next time
+  * Case VII (with gstreamer video in both the pipe-line)
+    * delay: ~100ms to ~220ms (unknown distribution/shape of variation)
+    * conduct-clap
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
+    * clap-clap
+    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
+    * Video quality is poorer, video smeard out
+    * Torleif: Worse than Case V
+    * Vivianne: Not good. Hard to clap, delay seems much longer than case V. Variance in delay not really noticable.
+  * Case VIII ( choir sees 3D view of conductor )
+    * Not to be tested yet due to challenges with technical equipment.
+=====   New tests with choir of 8 =====
+  * Mai 25, preparations from 9:00, choir show 13:00