User Tools

Site Tools


coip:labtest2012-05-11

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

coip:labtest2012-05-11 [2012/05/11 12:21] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Lab tests 2012-05-11 ======
  
 +
 +===== Init test (without Torleif) =====
 +
 +  * Case I (27ms + 27ms):
 +    * conduct-clap ​ + conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob)
 +    * Vivianne: more behind than last trail (which was 27 + 0ms)
 +    * Leif Arne: No change noticed
 +  * Case II (48 + 27, aspect and resolution change in video viewed by conductor)
 +    * conduct-clap ​ + conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob)
 +    * Vivianne: not much difference
 +    * leif arne & daniel: Less syncronized,​ more difficult two follow during slow-down
 +  * Case III (48 +48, aspect+resolution change both directions):​
 +    * conduct-clap ​
 +    * clap (no conduct)
 +      * echo (reverberation) noticable and disturbing
 +    * clap (no conduct, one-way audio)
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob, one-way audio)
 +    * ?
 +  * Case V (48 + 70)
 +    * Better image, one way audio
 +    * conduct-clap ​
 +    * clap-clap
 +      * vivanne can hear delay
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta-ta father jacob, one-way audio)
 +    * clap-clap with two-way audio
 +
 +===== Tests with Torleif, Vivanne, Daniel, Leif Arne =====
 +  * Case 0 (in same room)
 +    * conduct-clap
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
 +    * clap-clap
 +    * vivianne: conduct-clap less presise than clap-clap
 +
 +  * Case I (27+27)
 +    * conduct-clap
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
 +    * clap-clap
 +    * Thorleif: conductor is smaller, feels more distant
 +    * Vivianne: no noticable delay (compared to in-rom)
 +    * Leif Arne: camera infront no longer an issue (compare to previous test day)
 +
 +  * Case III (48+48)
 +    * conduct-clap
 +      * camear adjustment needed (due to aspect ratio bug)
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
 +    * clap-clap
 +    * Vivianne: conducting works fine, clapping has delay, on speedup your are behind, on slowdown your are in sync
 +
 +  * Case V (48 + 70)
 +    * conduct-clap
 +      * 30 fps: All noticed, smudged movements
 +      * Retail with 60 fps
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
 +    * clap-clap
 +      * Vivianne: ​
 +        * bigger camera make poorer contact with middle person
 +        * delay is managable, simpilar to what is common with large choir (large choir may even be worse)
 +
 +  * Case "​Screen size"
 +    * Recorded conductor
 +    * Vivianne: When conductor is approx real size he seems too close
 +      * Combination of too close and recorded conductor is unatural
 +    * Torleif: No problem with enlarged sizes
 +    * Leif Arne: Keystone problems
 +    * Vivanne: 75% of real height seems to be a minimum, smaller give you a "​look-for-him"​ feeling
 +    * Torleif: Size is easy to get used to, close to real size is preferrable though
 +    * Vivianne: Conductors gaze not in camera (but moving around in virtual choir) makes a more distant feeling.
 +
 +  * Case VI (with gstreamer video in one pipeline)
 +   * To be tested next time
 +
 +  * Case VII (with gstreamer video in both the pipe-line)
 +    * delay: ~100ms to ~220ms (unknown distribution/​shape of variation)
 +    * conduct-clap
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
 +    * clap-clap
 +    * conduct-sing (ta-ta)
 +    * Video quality is poorer, video smeard out
 +    * Torleif: Worse than Case V
 +    * Vivianne: Not good. Hard to clap, delay seems much longer than case V. Variance in delay not really noticable. ​
 +
 +  * Case VIII ( choir sees 3D view of conductor )
 +    * Not to be tested yet due to challenges with technical equipment.
 + 
 +
 +=====   New tests with choir of 8 =====
 +  * Mai 25, preparations from 9:00, choir show 13:00 
coip/labtest2012-05-11.txt ยท Last modified: 2012/05/11 12:21 (external edit)